Is Going Beyond Rasch Analysis Necessary to Assess the Construct Validity of a Motor Function Scale?

Guillot T, Roche S, Rippert P, Hamroun D, Iwaz J, Ecochard R, Vuillerot C; the MFM Study Group.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018. 99(9), 1776-1782.e9.
Comparison of the fit quality of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Rasch models on MFM item scores in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy (FSHD) and Steinert’s disease (DM1).
The CFA model showed a better fit to the data than the Rasch model, regardless of the disease (P <0.001).

PubMed link

Keywords: Factor analysis, Neuromuscular diseases, Outcome measure, Psychometrics

Articles in scientific journals

Protocol for a phase II, monocentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess efficacy of pyridostigmine in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4 (SPACE trial)

Stam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Bartels B, Asselman FL, Otto LAM, Goedee HS, Habets LE, de Groot JF, Schoenmakers MAGC, Cuppen I, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. BMJ Open. 2018. 30;8(7):e019932.  Protocol of the "SPACE" in wich MFM is used as an outcome measure....

read more